24.5.12

The Lion Ring

Roaring Lion
Bronze Statue
...it's a matter of Pride.

Lion Ring Seal With Imprint


Note: perspective is off, since She is no Artist

The Lion is a Symbol of both the Tribes Judah and Dan. Legend has it that King Solomon wore a Signet Ring that conferred magic powers to Him s.t.n. He may control the Wind, Demons and Jinn and understand the language of the animal kingdom. As King He used such a ring to Set His Seal on official documents and coduct other courtly business.

In General, a seal-making device is also referred to as the seal matrix or die; the imprint it creates is the seal impression (or, more rarely, the sealing). If the impression is made purely as a relief resulting from the greater pressure where the high parts of the matrix touch, the seal is known as a dry seal. (wikipedia)


Today, setting a seal or  'sealing' has to do with protecting from public view court documents in order to guard State Secrets or in Witness Protection programs.

No One other than King Solomon has ever seen His Ring and if they had, they would not have 'lived' to tell about it (get it, they 'die' first). Some guess that it had 4 jewels, some think it was embossed with the Star of David and inscribed with the Ineffable Name(s) of God.

Some bear the Seal (stigmata as a white scar from a heat impression) since it is never appropriate to welcome such High Heads of State (Emissaries) with the Universal One Finger Salute.

Lately I've been 'hearing' "Beautiful! Beautiful!"   -- something that my friend Paul (the 'glazier') is known to say, where most people suffice to say, "Wow!", or "Oh, My God!" or simply,  "O, Gee!"

Since that can't be a comment on Her Artistic Endeavors (that's Michael's Forte), if She is sooo beautiful and You took the Time (Out) to imprint Her with Your Stamp of Approval, why is it that You Know her name(s), address(es) and phone number(s), and yet She doesn't know the first thing about You? (Aside: I know, it's because she is a blabber mouth and is likely to post your Identity on this ProScribed blog of hers that NoBody reads, once she runs your license plates for the world wide web users to see--I really wouldn't).

Unless, it isn't a stamp of approval at all and more of a 'damned Yankee' tag--which is just as likely given what She registers as Your disappointment every time You spot Her and She 'hears' You 'say,' "...and here She is--again!"

(Another Aside: Her poor Spelling and Your obscure Stamping is a sure recipe for disaster, it's a good thing the Gramma(r) is holding up).

16.5.12

Humanity

"Men are so necessarily mad, that not to be mad would amount to another form of madness." --Blaise Pascal

Since the Space Ship Building Mission is temporarily suspended until otherwise informed, and yet still feeling the pull-- out of force of habit-- to visit and update this blog, I have gone through and peppered it with relevant quotes having to do with Madness and Insanity.

Note: 'Peppering' implies having excercised some level of restraint since I could just as easily have Salted it; but given the News that Your WIFE Is A Lunatic-- not that I suffer from lunacy but have come to enjoy it very much--I thought YOUwould appreciate the nexus.

BTW...Insanity in English means Madness and sounds just like the Arabic word for "My Humanity",  إنسانيتي  and if One happens to be afflicted with a lithp it may just as well be given as "inthanity" which means "My Woman"  or "Bend/Fold" or just as likely to be mistaken for,  if not listening carefully,  انفنتي  "Infinity".


11.5.12

Alright, All In

...and just as She suspected, He is All American!

Because the minute He finally does something that sets Her off, He says, "I'm Sorry--about that."

That being she discovers Her erstwhile 'Husband' is a Cross-Dresser!

Since the Revelation takes place in a public venue, She sucks it up (along with half a pack of cigarettes (American Spirits, organic, no added preservatives, pesticides, or accelerants--so they must be good for you) and says, "It's Okay."

And tries Her best to look on the bright side, after all, Her wardrobe had instantly doubled (if the 70's street fashion should ever take hold again in Her so-called-Lifetime), and She settles quickly on the idea that He's raiding Her panty drawer and doesn't mind it at all because He is so Clean He Squeeks.

And the cigarettes help interim with any oral fixation issues She may have that He is too busy exploring His femme side to satisfy.

And He finds some solace in Knowing that She takes the News so well, because She is not likely to let Beautiful and Sexy go to Her head since She doesn't trade in that and where She comes from that and $2.50 gets Her a ride on the NYC MTA.

Level headed to the bitter end She was never One to confuse Love with Pain or Brave with Stupid, either.

What else Ya got? (I Heard You Say 'Not another word,' but since this is off-topic, I felt it would be permissible)

{Added Monday May 14, 2012...The Identity Crisis continues, but She has come across this type of behaviour before---it all falls under the umbrella of MisUnderstanding--like when He Miss Takes for a Smile Her pained grimace (Her Old Age Talking) and what He calls that deep thoughtful introspective look on Her face for--- je ne c'est quoi--gravitas?, is simply Her trying to remember where She parked the car.}

"There is no point in driving yourself mad trying to stop yourself going mad. You might just as well give in and save your sanity for later."
--Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

11.4.12

You Go To Church And I Run For The Ship

Tough nut to crack!
Tundra Comic Panel 04.13.2012
Unrealized/UnRecognized Discovery?!!
(You and I both know that not to be the case; here are some caveats Quran 2:41, 2:79, 2:174, 3:77, 3:187, 3:199, 5:44, 9:9, and 16:95...However, that black Audi R8 that keeps popping up sure is tempting,
but like everything else You've thrown my way i have to walk away.)

{Aside: What's up with the 2 Mooning Moscovites kissing on the sofa across from me on 04.11.2012 at Web Way?--all I have to say about it is, "Only the devil whispers, the rest of us speak aloud.--I do, however, wish to thank her for the help."}

وَالأَنْعَامَ خَلَقَهَا لَكُمْ فِيهَا دِفْءٌ وَمَنَافِعُ وَمِنْهَا تَأْكُلُونَ (16:5
وَتَحْمِلُ أَثْقَالَكُمْ إِلَى بَلَدٍ لَّمْ تَكُونُواْ بَالِغِيهِ إِلاَّ بِشِقِّ الأَنفُسِ
إِنَّ رَبَّكُمْ لَرَؤُوفٌ رَّحِيمٌ(16:7
وَالْخَيْلَ وَالْبِغَالَ وَالْحَمِيرَ لِتَرْكَبُوهَا وَزِينَةً وَيَخْلُقُ مَا لاَ تَعْلَمُونَ (16:8
16:5 And (God) Creates cattle for you....
16:6...to carry your loads..without hardship....Indeed Your Sustainer is Most Compassionate, Beneficent.
16:7...and horses...for you to ride and in which you find beauty...and He Creates things that you have no knowledge yet.
Church Nave vs Naval v Ship's Hull vs Coracle vs Walnut vs Kernel
The ‘nave’ of a church derives from the Latin ‘navis’ for ‘ship', which also gives us the word ‘naval’--having to do with maritime, nautical, seafaring and navigational activities (ie., applications that include seabasing, projective power/force, etc.). While ships primarily refer to seagoing vessels, a ship may also refer to any vessel that traverses a fluid medium, be it water, air/space or 'time'. In the case of a 'space ship' it would be something which flies, ie, 'tayer' refer to 105:3.

Presumably the nave of a church came to be known as such from a fancied resemblance to a ship shape, but the shared characteristics between a church nave and ship shape is more intricately bound  than mere imagination might lead us to believe.

Winchester Cathedral is a good example (images below; Winchester Cathedral's nave and its reflection (reflected across the horizontal x-axis) reminiscent of a ship's hull, compare to a Viking ship's ribs).






Winchester Cathedral (Gothic Architectural Influence)
See Sacred Geometry, Reuleaux Triangle
Upside Down Image of Winchester Cathedral's Nave
Compare with Ship's Hull Planking/Ribs vs
Hull Sections











Viking Vessel Hull Ribs
(See Jonah vs Fish vs Whale vs 'knitted' paths vs.
W-curve-Throw-Woof-Wales-Knots, etc.)

The secondary meaning of nave derives from an Old English word ‘nafu’ (relates to the Arabic, nafs) having to do with the idea of ‘centrality’, like in a ‘hub of a wheel’ (refer to the Hindu concept of 'Chakras'), or connected to the root for the word ‘navel’ from the Latin for umbilicus (relating to womb/matrix/cervix/neck/belly), and/or the Greek omphalos, relating to ‘end of a scroll’ (refer to 105:4 'sijil') and ‘the boss of a shield’, respectively.

Other roots for which describe 'disk, sphere' , 'whirlpool,' and 'bud' --considered a feminine sexual center since ancient times and still in parts of the Middle East, India, and Japan (see Hindu concept of yoni, the Reuleuax triangle, Freemason Symbols/Architecture/Sacred Geometry). 
And that the general layout or plans of a church mimics the shape of a seafaring vessel is more than just a passing fancy. The similarities between a church and ship may even be extended to that of the human form, most conspicously reflected in Native American Kachina dolls.







Amiens Cathedral, France vs Kingston Vessel vs Kachina Doll

(Note the west end/nave/aisle/crossing/transept/choire/altar/east end of a typical crusiform church vs stern/transom/aft/engine room/port and starboard/bridge/pilot house/fore (bow or prow) of a ship vs the legs (ground contact/ actuators,--68:42 refers to  سَاقٍ 'saqiin' , refering to the legs or shins of the human body as well as bole/shaft/trunk and in verb form 'to drive') /pelvic region/torso/arms (actuators)/head (sky) of the kachina doll representation of the human form ).
The Anatomy of a Church v The Ship v The Human Being

Tradionally churches are oriented facing 'east'  and in a cruciform church as depicted above the entrance is directly opposite the altar, or at the 'west' end which is situated in the church 'facade' (front of the building). In this example, the entrance at the facade of the 'church' corresponds to the  ship's aft which corresponds to the human's feet (where the Human makes contact with the ground, Earth). (This establishes how the orientations of each body correlate--see Special Orthogonal matrix, SO(n, F) )
The relevence or orientation and the Eastward direction may have its basis in navigating and piloting effectively along the Earth's Magnetic Norms , early article with respect to bird flight and overcoming the Earth's Coriolis effect; The Journal o f Applied Physics, Vol. 18, No. 12, A Preliminary Study of a Physical Basis of Bird Navigation, by Henry Yeagley, December 1947)

Chapter 2 The Calfوَإِذْ قَالَ إِبْرَاهِيمُ رَبِّ أَرِنِي كَيْفَ تُحْيِـي الْمَوْتَى قَالَ أَوَلَمْ تُؤْمِن
قَالَ بَلَى وَلَـكِن لِّيَطْمَئِنَّ قَلْبِي قَالَ فَخُذْ أَرْبَعَةً مِّنَ الطَّيْرِ فَصُرْهُنَّ إِلَيْكَ
ثُمَّ اجْعَلْ عَلَى كُلِّ جَبَلٍ مِّنْهُنَّ جُزْءًا ثُمَّ ادْعُهُنَّ يَأْتِينَكَ سَعْيًا
وَاعْلَمْ أَنَّ اللّهَ عَزِيزٌ حَكِيمٌ 2:260

2:260 And when Abraham said, "Lord, show me how you give life to the dead." (God) Said, "Do you not Believe (accept it as True)?" (Abraham) said, "Yes, (of course), but so that I am reassured (with) inner (certainty, in my heart)." (God) Said, "Take 4 birds and train them to obey you, then place a portion of them on each mountain and call them; they will seek you (come to you) at your command (in order); and know/teach that God is Wise, Powerful."
By extension, those forces which are known to effect the 6 modes of motion of a ship (ie., translations--sway, surge and heave and rotations--yaw, pitch and roll) in the water (be it ocean, river, lake or estuary) may be understood in the context of movement in the analogous human (earth) and church (spiritual or sky) 'bodies'. (In 3-D, 6 degrees of freedom refers to these 6 modes of motion, while robotics and gaming applications refer to higher 'degrees of freedom' these are merely incremental of the 6 in general and not in  fact 'additional' degrees of freedom, which may only be accessible from higher dimensions in order to allow truly greater ranges of motion, see affine matrix, projection/perspective, etc.)
Watercraft Rotation
Note Hull Front View vs. S Curve vs. Walnut Shell

Watercraft Translation
The front view of a ship's hull bears a strong resemblance to a shield and in terms of the geometry is reminiscent of a 'bean curve', the smoothed out version described well by Cassini ovals. And the sides of which resemble an upside down 'ship's bell', each half of which can readily be modeled by the cumulative distribution function or S-Curve:
S-Curve Distribution Function
In terms of the mean (mu) and scale (beta, positive)

Bizarro Comics April 4, 2012
(I get it, I get it...
 There really is no need for You to rub it in...)
Coracles are keel-less, flat-bottom boats that are oval in a shape very similar to a half walnut shell (see walnut vs 2-D and 3-D Cassini Ovals, vs. Bean Curve, image below).

The design is intended to evenly distribute the weight of the boat and its load across the structure and to reduce the required depth of water — often to only a few inches, making it ideal for use on rivers (see Rivers of Time).

The coracle, called quffa in Arabic, is mentioned in the Bible, Exodus 2:3 as the water craft in which Moses's mother launched Him down the river to protect Him from Pharoah's decree to do away with the first born male children while the Israelites were dwelling in Egypt.

It was also frequently mentioned by my Dad whenever He wanted to remind any of us not to rush into anything in the form of a rhetorical question, "Must we jump from the quffa onto it's ears (handles)?" The short answer, 'tho none is called for to answer a rhetorical question is, "No, no, for the simple reason that you may find yourself in an awkward position that looks something like Dilbert in the comic panel here."
Dilbert April 15, 2012
What it looks like to jump from the coracle onto its handles.


The Welsh apparently have a saying about it, too. Since it is a light-weight flat-bottom boat, it can be carried by one man (or woman) on his (or her) back, the saying goes, "the load of a man is his coracle".

While inherently unstable by design because it sits "on" the water, rather than "in" it, a coracle can easily be carried by currents and the wind,  the coracle makes for an effective fishing vessel since it hardly disturbs the water or the fish, being easily manuevered with one arm, while the other arm tends to the net. (Generally 2 coracles are required for 1 net).

Walnut, 2-D Cassini Ovals & 3-D Cassini Ovals vs.
2009 Homework Assignment (compare with geometry of Wankel engine)& Bean Curve

Coracles vary in design, as they are tailored to the river conditions where they are intended to be used. In general there is one design per river, but this is not always the case.


Quranic Reference to Vessels, Ships, Ark, Orbits, Boats/Coracles & Orbits


Walnut Halve Shell, Vietnamese Coracle
 (Watercraft, Ship, Naval Application),
Boat Hull, Whole Walnut (note flange)

The Teifi coracle, for example, is flat-bottomed to negotiate shallow rapids, common on the river in the summer, while the Carmarthen coracle is rounder and deeper, better suited to negotiate the tidal waters on the Tywi, where there are no rapids.

Traditional Teifi coracles are made from locally harvested wood — willow for the lats (body of the boat), hazel for the weave (Y bleth in Welsh — the bit round the top) — while Tywi coracles have been made traditionally made of sawn ash.

 
Teifi coracles use no nails, and rely on interweaving the lats for structural coherence (see 'cracking open an alien spaceship'), while the Carmarthen ones use copper nails and no interweaving.

 
Modern working coracle boats are made of fiberglass.

The general idea for integrating the conepts above:
(2-D representation from 3-D or higher dimensional equivalents involve orthonormal projection, reflection, translation, etc. to conceptualize real-world equivalents which may account for why UFO witnesses percieve the craft morphing/transfigures when it impinges on Earth's airspace).


Proportions Based on a Kernel


___________________________
Walnut Shell Cross Section vs
Wankel Engine (note Reuleux Triangle)
While the coracle resembles the shape of a half walnut shell, the cross-section of a walnut shell is characteristic of the compression chamber of the Wankel rotary engine.

In the basic single-rotor Wankel engine, the oval-like epitrochoid-shaped housing surrounds a rotor which is triangular with bow-shaped flanks (reminiscent of the Reuleaux triangle, a three-pointed curve of constant width, but with the bulge in the middle of each side a bit more flattened).

In the Wankel engine, the expansion phase of the cycle is much longer than that of the Otto cycle, and the four strokes of a typical Otto cycle occur in the space between a 3-sided symmetric rotor and inside the housing.

The central drive shaft, called the eccentric shaft or E-shaft, passes through the center of the rotor and is supported by a fixed bearing.

The shaft turns 3 times for each rotation of the rotor around the lobe and once for each orbital revolution around the eccentric shaft.


The Wankel engine cycle is shown in the diagram below.

In the diagram above:
The "A" marks one of the three apexes of the rotor
The "B" marks the eccentric shaft and
And the “white portion” is the lobe of the eccentric shaft

The Wankel engine is actually a variable-volume progressing-cavity system. There are 3 cavities per housing, all repeating the same cycle.
Eccentric shafts do not have the stress-raising internal corners of crankshafts and Wankel engines also generally have a much higher redline than a reciprocating engine of similar power output. This is in part because the smoothness inherent in circular motion, but especially because they do not have highly stressed parts such as a crankshaft or connecting rods.
Points A and B on the rotor and e-shaft turn at different speeds--point B moves 3 times faster than point A, so that one full orbit of the rotor equates to 3 turns of the e-shaft.
The shape of the rotor between the fixed corners is meant to minimize the volume of the geometric combustion chamber and a maximize the compression ratio.
The symmetric curve connecting two arbitrary apexes of the rotor is maximized in the direction of the inner housing shape with the constraint that it not touch the housing at any angle of rotation (an arc is not a solution of this optimization problem).
.
.
.
While the Wankel engine has some disadvantages compared to conventional 4-stroke engines, having to do with thermal boundry layer, apex seal failures, and slightly higher fuel consumption, it has certain performance and safety advantages that make it difficult to overlook as a viable future engine technology.
.
.
.
Wankel engines have certain advantages over conventional 4-stroke engines ;they are considerably lighter, simpler, and contain far fewer moving parts than equivalent piston engines.
When operating within their original design parameters Wankel engines are almost immune to catastrophic failure.
Because valving is accomplished by simple ports cut into the walls of the rotor or side housings, they have no valves or complex valve trains; and since the rotor rides directly on a large bearing on the output shaft, there are no connecting rods and there is no crankshaft.
The elimination of reciprocating mass and the elimination of the most highly stressed and failure prone parts of piston engines result in high reliability, a smoother flow of power, and a high power-to-weight ratio.
The surface/volume-ratio  (S/V) problem is so complex that a direct comparison between a reciprocating piston engine and a Wankel engine cannot be readily assessed. The flow velocity and the heat losses behave quite differently.
Surface temperatures behave absolutely differently; the film of oil in the Wankel engine acts as insulation. Engines with a higher compression ratio have a worse surface/volume ratio.
The surface/volume (S/V) ratio of a Diesel engine is much worse than a gasoline engine, but Diesel engines are well known for a higher efficiency factor than gasoline engines. Diesel and alternate fuel versions of Wankel engines have been developed by Deere and others, and the Wankel engine lends itself to hydrogen fuel (fuel cell) applications.
Comparing engines of equal power, a naturally aspirated 1.3-liter Wankel engine with a naturally aspirated 1.3-liter four-stroke reciprocating piston engine with equal power, such a four-stroke engine is not possible and needs twice the displacement for the same power as a Wankel engine.
The extra or "empty" stroke(s) should not be ignored, as a 4-stroke cylinder produces a power stroke only every other rotation of the crankshaft. This doubles the real surface/volume (S/V) ratio for the four-stroke reciprocating piston engine and the demand of displacement.
So the Wankel engine has higher volumetric efficiency and a lower pumping loss since it has no choke valves.
Because of the quasi-overlap of the power strokes that cause the smoothness of the engine and the avoidance of the 4-stroke cycle in a reciprocating engine, the Wankel engine is very quick to react to throttle changes and is able to quickly deliver a surge of power when the demand arises, especially at higher rpm. This difference is more pronounced when compared to four-cylinder reciprocating engines and less pronounced when compared to higher cylinder counts.
Due to a 50% longer stroke duration than a four-cycle engine there is more time to complete the combustion. This leads to greater suitability for direct injection.
In addition to the removal of internal reciprocating stresses by virtue of the complete removal of reciprocating internal parts typically found in a piston engine, the Wankel engine is constructed with an iron rotor within a housing made of aluminium, which has a greater coefficient of thermal expansion--ensuring that even a severely overheated Wankel engine cannot seize, as would be likely to occur in an overheated piston engine. This is a substantial safety benefit of use in aircraft.

Since there are no valves and valve trains to burn out, jam, break, or malfunction in any way, again increasing safety.

A further advantage of the Wankel engine for use in aircraft is the fact that a Wankel engine generally has a smaller frontal area than a piston engine of equivalent power, allowing a more aerodynamic nose to be designed around it.

The simplicity of design and smaller size of the Wankel engine also allows for savings in construction costs, compared to piston engines of comparable power output. And the Wankel engine is capable of running at very high speeds and operates almost noiselessly.
A Wankel engine that loses compression, cooling or oil pressure will lose a large amount of power and fail over a short period of time. It will, however, usually continue to produce some power during that time. Piston engines under the same circumstances are prone to seizing or breaking parts that almost certainly results in major internal damage of the engine and an instant loss of power.

For this reason, Wankel engines are very well suited to applications in remote places where a failure could result in fatalities; and aircraft, where abrupt failure is likely to lead to a crash or forced landing.
_____________________________


{ok, ok, I am more than a  little weirded out that someOne is asking just how long this has been going on--not only did I think You Knew but I thought You Planned it!}
Quran Surah 7 Al-A3Raf
  فَأَرْسَلْنَا عَلَيْهِمُ الطُّوفَانَ وَالْجَرَادَ وَالْقُمَّلَ وَالضَّفَادِعَ وَالدَّمَ
آيَاتٍ مُّفَصَّلاَتٍ فَاسْتَكْبَرُواْ وَكَانُواْ قَوْمًا مُّجْرِمِينَ (7:133

7:133 That We Sent them floods, and locusts, and lice, and frogs, and blood; Separate Signs (of severence, disentanglement, judgment, to decide...), yet they (continued) in their arrogance and were an immoral (criminal) community. (133/7==19)






















Green Frog vs Origami Frog


Green Frog vs. Walnut Halves vs.Kernel
Child Pose Yoga Position vs Walnut Kernel (See Above)

14.2.12

An Affine-ity of Sorts

The Preamble/(sick to my stomach today anyway so this is a fitting reminder):

قُل لَّوْ شَاء اللّهُ مَا تَلَوْتُهُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَلاَ أَدْرَاكُم بِهِ فَقَدْ لَبِثْتُ فِيكُمْ عُمُرًا مِّن قَبْلِهِ أَفَلاَ تَعْقِلُونَ
(10:16)


(10:16) Say, "If God Willed I would not have brought it (The Quran) to you and you would not have known anything of it, and I dwelled amongst you a Lifetime before (I brought it). Will you not use your Reason?"

{Aside: There are some out there who think I took it upon myself to do this, when the fact is that I did not volunteer and I know it's not my place to do so and I tried my best to avoid it. Sign 10:16 is eloquent in stating how this is not just in my head, it's all in my past. Which begs the question, what am I still doing here?}

Algorithms exist which can track critical distance from a moving plane point P (ie, where You are when You visit the Orange Field) to a static smooth curve (ie, where You Originate/Are Projected from,  be it the Blue or Gray field), without resorting to global search strategies beyond initialization (ie, so You do not get lost in space and always know the starting point).

Such an approach involves detecting transition events associated with the point's perturbation and successfully dealing with annihilation or creation events (ie., annihilation/creation are one and the same events temporally speaking, which one You experience depends on where You happen to be 'standing', ie., Your Point of View/Perspective) associated with the perturbations at the transitions in order to avoid global searches for critical distances once such transitions are encountered and at such transitions or various curve discontinuities (ie., like if You find Yourself at the cusp of a logocycle or saddle point in space, because...
U.R.IBIN (ie., My 'Son'-- 'Of Me'--You can travel through it):








Given Vectors defined by Chapter:Sign:Word Location  سِيرُوا   'seeru'  'Travel':

3, 137, 6  (alif, lam, mim)
6, 11, 2  (non muquati'at)
16, 36, 24 (non muqati'at)
27, 69, 2  (tta, sin)
29, 20, 2 (alif, lam, mim)
30, 42, 2 (alif, lam, mim)
and
9, 2, 1 (non muqati'at)  ('Travel' given as سِيحُواْ   ' seehhu' so this particular Sign may or may not be part of the vector space considered here) 

First square matrix taken in chapter ascending order where the word 'Travel' appears in the same location, ie, word number==2:
27, 69, 2 (tta, sin)
29, 20, 2 (alif, lam, mim)
30, 42, 2 (alif, lam, mim)

Second square matrix taken in chapter ascending order and share the same muqati'3at == alif.lam.mim.:
3, 137, 6 (alif, lam, mim)
29, 20, 2 (alif, lam, mim)
30, 42, 2 (alif, lam, mim)


Mathematically, transition events are related to singularity and catastrophe theories. Algorithms have also been established that track point-curve critical distances exactly on piecewise smooth curves, deriving algebraically the unfolding formulas for degenerate critical distances (ie., to make it easier for me to find You because when it comes to Math and Science, I am a little retarded--not necessarily a self-depricating bad thing since by the time it occurs to me just how angry I should be, the problem is resolved and I just have to convince myself all there's left to do is wait for the dust to settle).

------------------------------------------------------
Neurotransmission (see gears) means "I love you, but I don't need the same."

Yeah, Right! I think Malcolm is an Old Man, Like I go around thinking I am the Queen of the Main!
I just wanted to have everybody change their concept of pre-cursor!

But since it's all been carefully arranged that I can't get off the ground, and I am as of today completely dispossessed, I would like to finally get paid so I can afford to pack my suitcase and move on down the line.

Oh, and I'd really like to see my Late (aka Delinquent) Father right about now.
----------------------------------------------------

from Tracking Point-Curve Critical Distances, X. Chen, E. Cohen and R. Riesenfeld

3.2.12

Ahh 2B A Stah

I was trying not to post anything new in 2012 and simply spend the rest of my time completing earlier posts; some of which were set aside while new ones were started, some of which had work lost mid sentence and the material could not be readily recalled for completion.

But here are a few thoughts on what others (them) think.

Let me preface what follows by saying that I am not in the best frame of mind--hard day having to digest the confirmation that I am step-mother to my own children; my grandchildren are afraid to so much as look at me--God only knows what they are being told about me; my hair is falling out in clumps from spending too much time at 0G and not due to my jumping for joy, but being hopping mad; I still hear random individuals take the liberty of pronouncing my name to whomever/whatever Unknown is on the other side of the phone (Skype)line when I pop into my neighborhood Starbucks (I had avoided going there for several weeks and then when I ventured in again that Mr Oh!G still could be overheard doing the same); then to have that one individual actually wake me from my sleep by calling me from within my private room.


Look, if I so much as suspect that voice as coming from a man or woman I've come across I have no reason to trust them, because, well because this and still no reasonable explanation (so whoever knows this much about me is by default automatically implicated in the crime and that's why no signal from outerspace, see I can ignore them just like they did me and then some, because I can do it on multiple levels)!

I find myself still making excuses for noises and pressure changes in my car, trying to rationalize what's weird, and the flashes I see while driving or going about my daily so-called life are not because they are shooting my picture but whatever it is I know Who to thank for what I've been calling migraines.

So this post is all about apertures. Openings, or 3ayns, like our eyes where light enters, and anuses where skutt leaves, and why never the two 3'ayn shall meet.

Overheard at, where else but the salone of the 21st century, coffee shop a man was explaining to someone how it is the very nature of the human brain to be the center of its universe-- to make everything in the world about that individual and why everyone, no matter who they are, or what they say, all want to be a Star! Not a Planet, or Blackhole, or some other Space Debris, but a Star--and not as a destination-- no wonder we are all still stuck here on (multiple) Earth.

Spoken like someone who only knows everyone in Los Angeles. And this man's sweeping assessment of everyone's basic nature and true character is nothing more than the projection of probably his own aspirations onto everyone else.

After all if he wants it, then surely doesn't everybody else?

Are they any better than what he thinks?

Can they possibly be any different?

The Argyle Sweater Feb. 21, 2012
"Why Would Anyone Try Not to be Noticed?"
What? Why? Are they aliens?

Well, unlike him, I can't speak for everyone else. But some of us, me, a handful of friends, family, and acquaintences don't seem to want that. Some of us do-- the ones born and raised in LA, but on the whole we don't spend time even thinking about it. Not that we can't appreciate a Star when we see one. I enjoy a reason to dress up and see a show as much as anyone, but that  doesn't mean I want to be in every production!

My Mother, for example, all she is ever on about (when she catches sight of me, anyway) is 'Land! Land!' and I'm like 'What on Earth is Her preoccupation with Land?'

True, its rising up out of the Water is fascinating, but that trick got old after the first time.

Speaking for myself, its not so much what I want as much as what I don't or didn't ever want--any problems. Because then I would be forced to have to sit down and try to solve them and that leads to just one math mistake after another (and then HE wipes out the final touches to my antenna).

And for the gentleman who thought he was channeling my Father on his way out the shop by telling me to "Study!" That's like the last thing my Father would ever adjure me to do, in fact He once emphatically told me I do too much reading and studying and to make His point stick, He literally threw the book at me (it was Calculus).

"Books have led some to learning and others to madness."
--
Petrarch

31.12.11

Lay On MacDuff

"Lay on, MacDuff, and damned be him who first cries ‘Hold! Enough!”
-Macbeth, William Shakespeare

…them’s fighting words?
Sounds more like poke'r to me.
(I Am my Father's daughter and, like Him, I, too, believe that Gaming is the only sport where you lose as soon as you sit down to play it, and in order to make real money You just gotta Earn it (as in work for it and not simply rely on the luck of the draw)).

“Who would want to hurt you?”
When the question was first posed over 15 years ago, my naiveté would only permit the following response;
"Duh--like I don’t know…”

But in retrospect the answer is more than likely, “Practically the entire human populace because I had to be the one to break it to them that for all their pageantry and eons of human evolution, they still haven’t figured out how to have sex—they go around big-footing it all over the world when the men can’t even make a conquest in their own bedrooms, being easily duped into believing otherwise; and their women have it in for me since, (apparently even Dr. Ruth did not venture into this uncharted territory), there are juicy signs as torrential as the Great Flood, and now the jig is up and they can’t fake it any more (like in the diner scene in the movie When Harry Met Sally--and unlike that film Producer's Mom in that same scene I Don't Want What She's Having!)."

(What does everybody think Rain songs on the Radio are all about—the weather? For that we have the meteorological forecast.)

...and, speaking of Meteo-rites, an alien take on their solar system...

Surah 34 Sheba (The Queen of She-Ba)

أَفَلَمْ يَرَوْا إِلَى مَا بَيْنَ أَيْدِيهِمْ وَمَا خَلْفَهُم مِّنَ السَّمَاء وَالْأَرْضِ
 إِن نَّشَأْ نَخْسِفْ بِهِمُ الْأَرْضَ أَوْ نُسْقِطْ عَلَيْهِمْ كِسَفًا مِّنَ السَّمَاء
 إِنَّ فِي ذَلِكَ لَآيَةً لِّكُلِّ عَبْدٍ مُّنِيبٍ  34:9  

34:9 Do they not see how much lies (open) between their hands and how much is (lies) hidden in the Heavens and Earth...(in other words, how little they see of what lies open and hidden in Heaven and Earth?); if We Willed We Eclipse/Cleave the Earth with them or Drop pieces of the Sky over them; Truly (Indeed), in these Signs (are) Every Servant (of God) Foretells/Predicts/Calculates/Is Penitent/Remorseful.

Penitent and Remorseful, sound a lot like Sad to me, and while it is True that '...you can get addicted to a certain kind of sadness (Song Lyrics from 'Somebody That I Used To Know') I, for one, do not enjoy being sad...but I should have figured out there was a problem much sooner, at the first hint that my friends thought they saw me coming in Orange when I know I was Blue.

But Colors are another subject altogether, it's much easier to just stick with the numbers..

"I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people."
--
Isaac Newton

Sign 34:9, taken as a simple ratio is 3.77777777....or Three (3) + (7/9). Nine we all know is 3^2.
The fraction or decimal portion when dividing by 9 always given by a single repeating numeral; 1/9=0.11111...; 2/9=0.22222....; 3/9=0.333333...;...and 13/9=1.44444.....

In this case MOD(34, 9)=7, ie. 7/9 or a repeating decimal of 0.7777777...

Relationship Between Solar System Planets/Objects
With Respect to Mercury@ 1AU vs Earth@1AU
and the Lemniscate Constant
The first approximation as to why there may be something out there according to the Table Above. Assuming a progression or natural harmonic for the mean distance (aka semi-major axis of an elliptical orbit) of the known planets/objects in the Solar System, the product of the Lemniscate Constant (2.6225) and each planet/object's mean distance (using Earth as the basis for 1 AU) results in a value close to that planet/object's mean distance with respect to  Mercury as the basis for 1 AU.

This was used as a first order approximation since the Lemniscate ties in well with orbits/space/time  and the pattern emerged readily.

Using the conventional standard Earth mean distance at 1AU, then Mercury =0.387 AU x 2.6225 (the Lemniscate constant)= 1.015AU (giving the Earth Mean Distance by this convention, and about what it takes to make Mercury the convention for 1AUhttp://www.solargeometry.com/).

Since this also corresponded roughly to the mean distance of the Earth @ 1 AU, the way the table developed it turned out to be the 3rd object from Mercury, while still being the 3rd Planet from the Sun (ie., compare distances in column O_n vs column C_(n+3) vs D_n ).

The next outer planet Venus mean distance wrt Earth=1AU then follows from  0.7224AU (wrt Earth=1AU) x (2.6225)= 1.866 AU (Venus mean distance wrt Mercury=1AU). The expectation being a value close to 1.9 AU should correspond to some planet/object y for this pattern to hold in Column C Row 7.

Then to keep an even distribution and give Mars as the 3rd planet from   'something (phi= j)'  between Mercury and Venus is expected to be near 1-1/3 AU (wrt Mercury @ 1AU s.t. the mean distance wrt Earth @ 1AU  in C3 is (1.33../2.58..) approx. 0.516 AU x (2.6225)= 1.3533 (a mean distance that roughly corresponds to Mars mean distance in Column C Row 6, according to this pattern (distance in O3 vs C6)).

The 1-1/3 value was not selected at random (refer to the Lusona lesson). The idea was to keep the distribution about as even as possible and keep as much symmetry in the distribution as possible.

Since a rough estimate for the mean distance to a Kuiper Belt object was taken as a round number, 50 AU wrt Earth @ 1 AU, worked out to approximately 129.17 AR wrt Mercury @ 1 AU and when 50*the Lemniscate constant worked out to 131, a number close enough to 133 to keep the symmetry given the breadth of the field of such objects,  this was in good enough keeping (both in the progression and geometry) to guess something 'phi' at 1.3333 AU (in Column C Row 3). It also didn't hurt that 133/7 = 19 (see further down the post).

(I hope You are reeling with awe regarding the shallow depth of Knowledge I have in Astrophysics; but, since I can't even do simple math or hold a number in my head longer than a femtosecond,  this is what I can manage).

Pursuing this method, objects/planetoids were expected at locations j= x, y, z, aa, and bb. The pattern that emerged simply using the Lemniscate constant as a multiplier holds at least up to mean distance of Kuiper Belt objects from the Sun.

Unlike the finesse required for Rocket Science, ever the tactful one, this is more of  a bludgeon approach to introduce an 'error' (j, x, y, z...) and check for 'ringing' kind of engine.ear.ring---(Where Can I Go to See What You *(all) Got?).

The idea is to keep some constant multiplier (in this case 2.6225...that would give the next outer planet/object approximate mean distance in an orderly fashion, and keep percent errors as close to 0 as possible for known planets/objects/'guesstimates'.

--What's the use? There ain't no use, if it's gonna hit, it'll hit--this is simply a pain-coping mechanism short of resorting to illicit drugs.

Flatlander Fred's Encounter With A Sphere

A Meaty-ORE from RealmSpace is About to Hit Flatlander Fred ’s Humble Home.

But, as You (ALL) can see, that's not really what a 3-D sphere looks like to 2-D Fred the Flatlander.
To Fred sitting in his living room one day, getting an unexpected visit from the sphere from ’outer space’, looks like it passes through the air right before his eyes.

To him, it will appear as if a circle came out of nowhere and materialized right before his eyes.

It expands rapidly, and Fred fears that its going to devour him and his house with him.

But to his relief, its growth slows down, then stops, then the circle starts to recede (shrink) again, but slowly. Then it starts to shrink faster and faster until it quickly disappears.

(Drawings and Text from Higher Dimensions. Find even More skillfully executed drawings and adventures of Fred, Emily, and Bob at Higher Dimensions.)


Mean Planetary Distance From the Sun vs Quotient of 19
For a second approximation, choose to represent each planet/object mean distance from the Sun as a quotient of 19, the farthest column shows the percent error between the quotient (calculated) and the apparent mean distance for each planet/object.

Well, why 19?---one finds themselves asking.

The easy answer is 'cuz the source under consideration says so...See?--Right here (Sign 74:30).
There are other more pragmatic reasons for choosing to represent each distance as a quotient of 19.
  • Most cases divide by 19 gives an irreducible fraction or a repeating decimal of period 18.
  • 19 in binary form is 10011_2
  • 19 and 17 form twin prime pairs.
  • 19 is the exponent for the Mersenne prime 2^19 -1=524 287, associated associated with the perfect number 137438691328 = (2^19 -1) (2^19 -1).
  • 524 287 binary form representation is 1111111111111111111_2. (presumably 1400++ years ago there were no computers at the Prophet's disposal, but now that we have some laying around maybe the binary form is of some interest and may give some interesting insights.)

Note: Pertaining to 17 as a twin prime to 19, an inner planet/object distance wrt Mercury @ 1AU x (17/9)=1.8888... holds a similar pattern as when using that planet/object's mean distance wrt Earth @ 1AU x the Lemniscate constant in the previous table; such that Mercury @ 1 AU x 1.88 = 1.88 (approx. Venus (1.86) wrt Mercury at 1AU); x @ 1.33 x 1.888...=2.52 approx. Earth (2.53) wrt Mercury at 1AU; Venus @ 1.86 x (17/9) = 3.5 (near Mars (3.9) wrt Mercury @ 1AU; Mars @ 3.9 AU x (17/9) = 4. 87 (about what is expected at location y (5 AU wrt Mercury at 1AU, etc.). The table is not shown in full in the interest of conserving space and since those values can be readily generated, simply using 19 as the multiplier, (ie., 133/7, but since that is a factor of 10 too high 19/10 x mean distance wrt  Mercury at 1 AU, would be the equivalent multiplier).

Using the Magic Angle M(theta) as an Iteration for Mean Distance Formula of Solar System Objects
An interim step using the Numerator for the Mean Distance as a Quotient of 19 was to derive the mean distance wrt the Magic Angle
qM

The formula in column H is mean distance in (column E_n/2.1)/(8+ACOS(1/Ö3)). This gives values for mean distance of each planet/object as a function of  (8+qM    .).

Each mean distance in H is given by the numerator of the mean distance expressed as a quotient of 19 (Column E)  divided by 2.1*(8+qM .).

The magic angle is typically given by Sec^-1  (Ö3) (for more on religious/spiritual/Masonic associations pertaining to Ö3) refer to Vesica Piscis (now We know what that Lost Bunny of the Apocalypse and Guam has been on about these past few weeks in the Prickly City Comic Strip).

While Arc_secant is typically an inverse trigonometric function used in the States, elsewhere it is simply expressed as the inverse cosine function Arcos (1/Ö3), (ie, 54.740 degrees or 0.9553166 radians; 54 degrees, 44 arc minutes, 24 arc seconds; or RA 3 h: 38 min: 58 sec).

A finagle factor (divide by 2.09, 2.1 or 1.5), while serving as a simple multiplier to approximate the mean distance relative to the magic angle, is a number that also relates to the packing density for body-centered and/or face-centered/or simple-cubic lattices.

While at first appearing to be quite random, this factor of 2.1, is really nothing other than 19/9 = 2.11111....(see twin primes 17 and 19 above, the ratio of each to 3^2 , the Gee_ometry of the Solar System,  and how they relate to each other here).

("So What?" You Say, "I can find some relationship between any 2 somethings!" While this is true, it is more difficult to find and keep relationships between sets of somethings that make sense Math-wise--that can only happen by Design and when done right it can be made to look like an Accident--See Lie Groups, Quotient or Factor Group, symmetry, continuous transformation isomorphic/homomorphic/kernel--->pre-image_null space+zero point field)

Solar System Planetary Distance From the Sun vs Root Approximations

The mean distances are represented as approximate roots and what emerged was interesting in that the golden mean (j) figured in some of them and more to the point was the fact that p/4 (ie. 4/p, or specifically (4/p)^2 ) also emerged as a convenient way to represent the mean distance of known planets and objects in the Solar system.

Euler's number was expected to emerge as well, when finding ways to set Mercury to 1AU, so wherever possible, it was attempted to work e into the formulas, but it didn't seem to fit naturally until resolving Kuiper Belt objects with this approach.

Sure we can do what Newton and Einstein and all the other highly respected physicists did, and we are familiar with their work, but can they predict what is coming out of nowhere based on their models?
Ducks Window Shopping Along the Boulevard
Venice, CA Feb 26, 2012
Reported to have Obeyed Traffic Rules,
Crossed The Street Using The Crosswalk
So, since God is Perfect and the News is All Good, just for kicks, a perfect Solar System should be well represented Mathematically without resorting to all the mind bending physics rigmarole, because I once was a highly developed thinker, but now I am retarded--especially after the recent 3-day 'migraine' layover--I think my brain is now Duck Soup, suited to simple tasks-- like shopping.

What's of interest here, is that in order for the pattern using prime square roots (Ö2, Ö3, Ö5, Ö7...), j, p and e to work, the Kuiper belt objects were refined to a mean distance of about 127.7(002)... which kept the percent error between the mean formula distance and that mean object distance as close to 0% as possible with a rather simple relationship that followed from using j^8 * e; and the number 127.7(02) also fit the pattern using p as a formula mean distance wrt Earth @1AU, which worked out to 8425/(21p)=127.702.

The root formulas had led to finding the magic angle relationship f(Ö3) in the previous table which bolstered guess-timating something of interest in the area of the Kuiper Belt objects close to the 127.7 AU wrt Mercury@1AU (or about 49.438 AU wrt Earth @ 1AU).

For the purposes of this exercise that distance for a Kuiper Belt object was revised from the first approximation of 133 AU to 127.702 AU (hopefully a refinement).
__________________________________________
It's especially exciting to see that p/4 (or (4/p)^2 ) since this intuitively means we are dealing with solid angles...wait while I check because I don't remember exactly why I thought this to be so exciting...

I even remember thinking seeing this (4/ p)^2   to be elegant at one point....
_________________________________________

The Lemniscate is an inverse curve of a hyperbola ( the Lemniscate of Bernoulli or 'pendent ribbon' being the familiar case---> sideways figure 8, a special case of the Cassinin Oval), so where 2 branches of a curve would asymptotically fly off to infinity as in the hyperbolic case, the Lemniscate as the inverse of such a hyperbola 'knots' or 'ties' the two ends together (so to speak, see reference heavens/knitting/intertwined/woven paths) 'binding' it to a closed path where it may 'curve' back on itself.

Other inverse curves of the hyperbola include the limaçon, and the strophoid (or 'belt with a loop', of which there are two types, the oblique strophoid or the right strophoid--similar in shape to the early Christian symbol Icthus). The right strophoid or foliate curve is also called the  logocycle curve properties include: forming the basis for deriving logarithms, is its own inverse curve, and has a total area A=4a^2 (the square of the semi-major? axis of the parabola), normals to the parabola are equal like radii are equal for a circle.

That the logocycle curve is called just that probably stems from its utility in deriving logs (logarithms), since the word logos originates from the Greek verb 'to count.' And it probably is no mere coincidence that the early Christian symbol Icthys (the fish)  is the shape of the logocycle curve. (He wonders why I try so hard when i know i am not even connected to the internet---but, did you hear what's playing on the radio, see what's on TV, listen to what they're preaching from the pulpit?--go ahead, keep trying to make me die (again) laughing).

Early Biblical translations of the nature of Jesus reflected in their understanding of 'In the Beginning there was the Word (Logos), and the Word (Logos) was with God, and the Word (Logos) was God.'  An attempt to understand a difficult concept about dualism.

More about the possible connection between Logos, Logocycle Curve, and the Transfiguration/Crusifixion/Resurrection of Jesus   (http://apageinthelife.blogspot.com/p/logocycle-and-transfiguration-of-jesus.html).

In 'Real World' terms this would imply that Time, while understood to be infinite, has a nature by which it can and does 'curve' back onto itself (The Equation of Time), and its 2 ends meet in some manner, much the same way a hyperbola inverts to a Lemniscate. (And yes, in someways  just like the Tide washes in and out).

Or, how a simple harmonic wraps around or projects from a developmental surface, such as a cylinder or cone, to form such curves.

This further implies that Time's asymptosy (too tempting not to use such a word given its definition, Asymptosy: A useful yet endangered word, found rarely outside the confines of the Oxford English Dictionary) is in fact not a direct 'one-way arrow' as we are led to believe by our limited faculties and life experience, but rather that it approaches the 'ideal' final limit, or its 'asymptote' arbitrarily closely without ever meeting or crossing it, according to the very definition of what it is to display asymptotic behaviour.

This asymptosy or arbitrary, random walk (like the shopping ducks appear to be doing unless someone notices they use the crosswalk), verging on the threshold (the ceiling, or boundary) is what we would call a 'meandering' path'...a paradox about the infinite in finite space-time similar in scope to the Diagonoal (Coastline) Paradox.

{The etymology for asymptotic from New Latin *asymptotus, and Greek asymptōtos;   a- not + sympiptein to meet, ie.,  not meeting, And from a- "not" + syn "with" + ptotos "fallen," verbal adj. from piptein "to fall", ie., not falling together. More to the point here is 'petition' as derived from 'piptein' ; "a supplication or prayer, especially to a deity," from O.Fr. peticiun (12c.), from L. petitionem (nom. petitio) "a request, solicitation," noun of action from petere "to require, seek, go forward," also "to rush at, attack," ult. from PIE base *pet-/*pte- "to rush, to fly" (cf. Skt. patram "wing, feather, leaf," patara- "flying, fleeting;" Hittite pittar "wing;" Gk. piptein "to fall," potamos "rushing water," pteryx "wing;" O.E. feðer "feather;" L. penna "feather, wing;" O.C.S. pero "feather;" O.Welsh eterin "bird"). Meaning "formal written request to a superior (earthly, but in my case Not).

The Argyle Sweater 02.13.2012
Scott Hilburn
"Get The 'L' Outta Here!"
And as such serves as the premise for this Letter from Multiple Earths (Aside: for those out there looking to assign summer reading try Mark Twain's 'Letters from Earth')--a supplication to God to get me the L out of here (it was some time ago that I got the hint that prayer is no longer necessary, I guess I reached a point where it won't do any more good so I figure it shouldn't hurt to just ask, again) because we did not fall together And I stand by my claim that We did land together, but He ditched me--on more than one occasion, without any explanation or good reason.

But if I have to be the one to come up with a reason (read Excuse) for this (hurtful) behaviour, it may have everything to do with asymptotic direction after such a 'landing'-- one in which the normal curvature is zero. Such that a point on an asymptotic curve (or line), is in a plane which bears both the curve's tangent and the surface's normal (perpendicular) at that point. The curve (or line) of intersection of the plane and the surface will have zero curvature at that point.
Asymptotic directions can only occur when the Gaussian curvature is negative (saddle) or zero (flat).

In the case of negative Gaussian curvature (the saddle), there will be 2 asymptotic directions and these directions are bisected by the principal directions; {which could explain Our Parting of the Ways.}


Asymptotic directions at a Saddle Point (Gaussian Curvature is Negative)
 are Bisected by the Principal Directions

(Michael, I know 1992 was a spoiler alert and I don't even have to pack, I just need to go and seeing how SomeOne grounded me for these last 2012-1996/1997 number of years, I Respectfully Request that You Bring the 'Car' Around and Collect Both Me and My Daughter, I Know my Son has indeed Gone On Ahead of Us--I'm not trying to be funny here).


The Quranic reference for norms (normals, ridges) at 7:46, 7:48, 7:89, (for the return; 7:168, 7:169, 7:174...

Now for Sedna...
Mean Distance Planets/Objects in the Solar System vs. 19 vs. Sedna


I don't have an exact equation for the orbit of Sedna, presumably someOne else has already figured that one out.

But working with area graphs based on the emerging pattern developed when dividing mean distances by 19, it is expected that someThing of interest will occur (if it hasn't already) at approximately 375 AU (wrt Mercury at 1 AU) when Sedna is about 54 to 55 years (c 2130 ) past its Perihelion (which is supposed to be c 2075), refer to Column P row 18 in the Table above.

From the above table mean Distances in Column D are a function of Distances in Columns O & P, in that the second outer Planet/Object is a function f(inner planet/object) s.t. D_n relates to D_n+2 directly. So, with this 'squishy' predictive algorithm it points to something (in the gap/Mah) in Column D 13 ~ 37.4 AU is related to some trans-Neptunian object ~ 72 AU wrt , and that there may be something related to this at a distance approximately 131 AU, (ie., between Kuiper Belt objects (~127 AU) and where Sedna orbits c. 2008/2012 (~224.5 AU - 250 AU), (average distances given wrt Mercury @ 1AU),---go Figure!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This post started off with a quote from Shakespeare's Macbeth, a play about a Scottish Thane, and appropriately so, as the History of the Christian Church in Scotland is consequent to the works of Saint Columba (one of the 12 Apostles of Ireland whose name, closely affiliated with the Scott Clan Malcolm aka MacCallum, derived from 'Colum Cille,' from Gaelic/Erse for 'Dove of the Church').


The Arabic for MacCallum sounds like , مكلم , 'm.k.l.m' which carries the meaning of having been 'Spoken To' and the understanding is that 'God Spoke To' one of them; and if God Spoke and Malcolm/MacCallum listened to Him that would make them Isma'3liya and would explain how these two Clan names are affiliated to each other.
{I'm certain God Met with better Success Speaking to Malcolm than I did with the Malcolm I tried to speak to recently, who was conflicted whether to 'break the ice?' or 'not break the ice?' So, I went waaaayyyy out of my comfort zone to make it easy for him and he let me know that he just didn't want to be bothered, (maybe it was his bad back talking, but I'll not be doing that again any time soon---hmmm, something intriguing about these cranky 'old' men 'though (read 'men of Olde')).


Both the Biblical names Jonah and Jonas share a Hebrew etymology for Dove, as does the Pleiades star cluster, 7 or more stars visible to the naked eye, that are associated with Sailing probably due to the onset of Navigation season upon their Helical Rising.


This narration, about the connection between the Scottish Clan Malcolm (derives from 'shaven head,' or 'priest') and MacCallum, Saint Columba, the Early Christian Church, the Dove, Sacred Geometry, Architecture, and other Symbols related to Hidden Knowledge (The Occult) is all the more curious given Heraldry's deep ties to Scottish Shields and Crests (Coats of Arms) and the emphasis Freemasons place on such Symbols/Signs/Representations.

To tie things up, the significant connectivity between the various threads of surface elements gleaned from this cursory study reveals some interesting details as to how they are intertwined. There is no telling what Revelation may be had from a comprehensive examination of just the elements mentioned here, if one were inclined to dig a little deeper into the Mystery (like, 'Where'd they go?!')